Legal Opinion

State v. Moore

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 20, 1891PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Wayne District Court. — Host. K. C. Heítry, Judge. The defendant was indicted, tried and convicted of the crime of incest; and, his motion for a new trial being ■overruled, judgment was pronounced against him, from which he appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtGivew, J.

T . dence: reie. I. On the trial the state was permitted to introduce testimony, over defendant’s objection, showing that a difficulty occurred in 1879' between the defendant and his sons, then residing at home ; that he told them to leave; and that they did so, and remained away. It is claimed on behalf of the state that the defendant drove the boys away, to make more convenient opportunity to-commit the offense charged. This quarrel occurred more than six years before the time the crime is alleged to have been committed, and for causes then existing-, that have no relation whatever to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Browne v. HickieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  2. Crane v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1888
  3. State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  4. Way v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific R'y Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  5. Stewart & Brown v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Heiman v. FelderSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  2. State v. BakerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1898
  3. State v. FrenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API