Legal Opinion

Fulliam v. City of Muscatine

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 18, 1886PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from Glinton Circuit Court. AotioN to recover for a personal injury. There was a trial to a jury, and verdict and judgment were rendered for the defendant. The plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

AdaMS, Ch. J.'

The plaintiff was injured while driving, on a dark night, on one of the streets of the defendant city. He testified, in substance, that a dangerous excavation or washout had occurred, and had been allowed to remain on one side of the street, and that in the darkness of the night, while using due care, he inadvertently drove into it, and his buggy was upset. The defendant contended that the plaintiff was not using due care, and that the proximate cause of the upsetting of the plaintiff’s buggy was not the condition of the street, but the breaking of the plaintiff’s harness,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Parkhill v. Town of BrightonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. CristIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Sylvester v. Incorporated Town of CaseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  3. Barnes v. Town of MarcusSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. Moore v. HuntingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Douglass ex rel. Osborne v. AgneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API