Legal Opinion

Robertson v. Ceola

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 10, 1973No. 73-167PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank Holt, Justice.

Appellee sued appellant for breach of an oral contract for the purchase and installation of certain materials during the construction of appellant’s house. Appellee was awarded $5,000 by a jury. For reversal of the judgment appellant asserts the jury’s award of damages was based upon speculation and conjecture. We must agree that appellee did not sufficiently prove his damages or loss of potential profits with reasonable certainty.

The proof of lost profits must be shown by evidence which makes it “reasonably certain” what the plaintiff would have made. Farmers Cooperative…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Black v. HogsettSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1920
  2. Sumlin v. WoodsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  3. Haney v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
  4. Friedman v. SchleuterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
  5. Columbus Mining Company v. RossCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Smith v. Walt Bennett Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1993
  2. Burton v. Artery CompanyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  3. Van Dyke v. GloverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  4. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. HollingsworthCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. Circle J Dairy, Inc., and Cross-Appellant v. A.O. Smith Harvestore Products, Inc., and Southern Harvestore Systems, Inc., and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API