Legal Opinion

Haney v. Caldwell

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 21 opinions

APPEAL from Pulaski .Circuit Court. Hon. J'. W. Martin, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Rattle, Special Judge.

The plaintiff, John K. Haney, in substance, states, in his complaint, that the defendant, Josiah Caldwell, on the twenty-first day of December,. 1871, by letter, employed him to act as his engineer in connection with his contract for the completion of the Little Bock and Fort Smith railroad, at a salary of twenty-five hundred dollars per annum; that plaintiff accepted said employment and served defendant as such engineer-in and about said contract for one year and one month from the date of such employment; and that by reason thereof defendant became indebted to him in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. School District No. 8 v. LynchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1866
  2. Gardner v. ClarkNew York Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Illinois Central Railroad v. CassellIllinois Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Martin v. New York Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Maynard v. Royal Worcester Corset Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Maxwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
  4. Wood v. KelseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  5. Robertson v. CeolaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API