Legal Opinion

Columbus Mining Company v. Ross

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided February 4, 1927PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Thomas

Reversing.

This is the second appeal of this case. The first opinion is reported in 204 Ky. 474. Briefly stated, the cause of action alleged was, that appellees and plaintiffs below, G-eorge Boss and J. B. Baynor, contracted with the appellant and defendant below, Columbus Mining Company, to clean out an abandoned entry to its coal mine located in Perry county, and to open up an air course and, perhaps, to do other repairs, and were to be paid a designated price per yard for driving the old entry and air course further into the coal, and they were also to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hammond v. BeesonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. People ex rel. Farnum v. San Francisco Savings UnionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Town of Royalton v. Royalton & Woodstock Turnpike Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1842
  4. Harness v. Kentucky Fluor Spar Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  5. Ross v. Columbus Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Buck v. MuellerOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Robertson v. CeolaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  3. Apex Metal Stamping Co. v. Alexander & Sawyer, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  4. McMahon v. Bryant Electric Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  5. Johnson v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API