Green Party v. Aichele
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
DALZELL, District Judge.
The question before us is whether the Commonwealth’s requirement that circula-tors of nomination papers for a candidate who seeks to appear on the general election ballot in Pennsylvania use different nomination papers for each county uncon*683stitutionally burdens plaintiffs’ First Amendment speech rights. For the reasons detailed below, we conclude this challenged statutory provision — the sole issue remaining among plaintiffs’' twenty-nine constitutional and statutory challenges to the Pennsylvania Election Code — is a reasonable, nondiscriminatory…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Benezet Consulting, LLC v. CortesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2020
- Thomas v. SchaefferDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- WILMOTH v. GUADAGNODistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- WILMOTH v. GUADAGNODistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021