Legal Opinion
WILMOTH v. GUADAGNO
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 20, 2021No. 3:16-cv-01854Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ALEXANDER ARSENAULT, TRENTON POOL, and ROQUE DE LA FUENTE, Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-01854 Plaintiffs, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 56); AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR TAHESHA WAY, in her official capacity as SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 55) the Secretary of State for the State of New Jersey, Defendant. Plaintiffs bring this action under
42 U.S.C. § 1983
to challenge the validity of a New Jersey law (
N.J. Stat. Ann. § 19:23-11) that requires persons circulating nominating petitions…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.