Legal Opinion

WILMOTH v. GUADAGNO

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided May 17, 2021No. 3:16-cv-01854Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY ALEXANDER ARSENAULT, TRENTON POOL, and ROQUE DE LA FUENTE, Civil Action No. 3:16-cv-01854 Plaintiffs, SUPERSEDING MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT TAHESHA WAY, in her official capacity as (ECF NO. 56); AND DENYING the Secretary of State for the State of New DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR Jersey SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF NO. 55) Defendant. This Memorandum and Order supersedes the prior Memorandum and Order entered on April 20, 2021 (ECF No. 84). The purpose is to clarify a statement made by an employee of the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API