Intex Recreation Corp. v. Team Worldwide Corp.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
This patent infringement case is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss the third claim for relief in plaintiffs complaint and on defendant’s motion to strike plaintiffs second affirmative defense to defendant’s counterclaim. The claim and affirmative defense both assert inequitable conduct in defendant’s application for a patent. Upon consideration of the arguments of the parties, the Court grants defendant’s motion to strike and its motion to dismiss.
I. BACKGROUND
On October 15, 2004, plaintiff Intex Recreation Corporation…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Sparrow, Victor H. v. United Airlines IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
- National Treasury Employees Union v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Acosta Orellana v. CROPLIFE INTERN.District Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Bates v. Northwestern Human Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Northwestern University v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Barnes & Noble, Inc. v. LSI Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. Lear Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.