Gordon v. Camp
Supreme Court of Florida
Motion to dismiss the case for non-payment of costs below, and for want of bond to secure costs to accrue.
1Opinion of the Court
Lancasteh, Justice.
On motion to dismiss this cause for want of bond for costs. — ■ Brockenbrough showed cause against the motion.
It is admitted that at the time the writ of error in this case was granted, no bond was then given. Since that time the attorney at law of the plaintiff has signed and filed a bond in their name, for costs, and as security on the bond, has deposited with the Clerk, one hundred dollars in money.
*24Perceiving that the opinion delivered at this term in the case of Morrison vs. McBride, had not met the approval of the bar, and being anxious to be right, the court have…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Ringgold v. GrahamTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Akins v. BetheaSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
- Gray v. State Ex Rel. Attorney GeneralSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965
- Callison v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
- In Re Durkee's WillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.