Legal Opinion

Akins v. Bethea

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 27, 1948PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEBRING, J.:

Cora Akins, G. W. Bethea, Opal Knowles, and Eula Wilder instituted a suit in equity against L. B. Bethea and The Perry Banking Company to set aside several property conveyances alleged to have been made by J. J. Bethea to L. B. Bethea as the result of undue influence exerted over the grantor in the conveyances. At final hearing the chancellor granted the relief sought as to one of the conveyances, denied relief as to the remainder, and adjudicated that “The costs of this suit are taxed against the defendants the same to be caluculated by the clerk of this Court.”

The plaintiffs…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lovett and Lovett v. LovettSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  2. News-Journal Corporation v. GoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  3. Wilhelm v. AdamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  4. Gordon v. CampSupreme Court of Florida · 1848
  5. Callison v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Dayton v. CongerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Rogers v. RogersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
  3. Flagala Corporation v. HammDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  4. Estate of BrockDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  5. Deehl v. KnoxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API