Legal Opinion

Ringgold v. Graham

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided February 13, 1929No. 990-5149PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.

Plaintiff in error dispossessed defendants in error of certain premises under a judgment rendered in a forcible detain-er case in the justice court of Foard county. The day following such dispossession they attempted to appeal from the judgment to the county court, by filing with the justice of the peace a bond signed by them, but with no sureties. Such bond was approved by the justice of the peace, who attached thereto a certificate reciting the receipt by him of $150 “as appeal bond.”

Upon a trial in the county court, defendants in error were found not guilty of forcible de-tainer, and…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Williams v. WileyTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Randon v. BartonTexas Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Logan v. GayTexas Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Young v. RussellTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Labadie v. DeanTexas Supreme Court · 1877

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Haginas v. Malbis Memorial FoundationTexas Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Gehret v. HetkesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  3. Dent v. PinesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. Rodriguez v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  5. American Spiritualist Ass'n v. City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API