Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael D. Pirello
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 20, 2001No. 00-30232PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge TROTT: Dissent by Judge BERZON
TROTT, Circuit Judge:
This appeal arises from the sentence imposed on defendant-appellant, Michael D. Pirello, who pled guilty to using the Internet to commit wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343. The district court applied a two-level enhancement to Pirel-lo’s base offense level under United States Sentencing Guidelines § 2Fl.l(b)(3) (“U.S.S.G. § 2Fl.l(b)(3)”) for using mass-marketing to effectuate his crime. Pirello challenges the applicability of U.S.S.G. § 2Fl.l(b)(3) to his case. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reno v. American Civil Liberties UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Jose Alfredo Maldonado, AKA ChinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Leon-ReyesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- United States v. SutcliffeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. LaurientiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. HeckelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. DrewDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- United States v. MagnusonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.