Legal Opinion

United States v. Drew

District Court, C.D. California

Decided August 28, 2009No. CR 08-0582-GWPublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION ON DEFENDANT’S F.R.CRIM.P. 29(c) MOTION

GEORGE H. WU, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This case raises the issue of whether (and/or when will) violations of an Internet website’s1 terms of service constitute a crime under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”), 18 U.S.C. § 1030. Originally, the question arose in the context of Defendant Lori Drew’s motions to dismiss the Indictment on grounds of vagueness, failure to state an offense, and unconstitutional delegation of prosecutorial power. See Case Docket Document Numbers (“Doc.Nos.”) 21, 22, and 23. At that time, this Court found…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. United States v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Kevin Nguyen v. Barnes & Noble Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. NosalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Fteja v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  4. Berkson v. Gogo LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  5. Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API