United States v. Magnuson
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Rudolph Carl Magnuson pled guilty to one count of wire fraud, pursuant to a written agreement. Magnuson argues that the district court erroneously imposed a two-level sentencing enhancement for using “mass-marketing” in the commission of his offense and clearly erred in assessing a $20,000 fine. We affirm.
Magnuson operated an advance fee scheme, placing ads in grocery store tabloid newspapers promising interest-free loans. After collecting “application fees” and “deposits” from unwitting victims, Magnuson kept the money for his own use and did not extend a loan to any applicants.
He objects to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mink v. AAAA Development LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Marion Eugene FairCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Michael D. PirelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Todd Deming, Drew Deming, Bruce Deming, and Ann DemingCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
3Cited by21 opinions
- United States v. Enitan IsiweleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. MauskarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. HeckelCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Anthony ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. SloanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.