Legal Opinion
Ward v. United Foundries, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided July 6, 2011No. 2010-1049 and 2010-1275PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
{¶ 1} This dispute involves the interpretation of a stop-gap endorsement to a commercial liability insurance policy that appellee, Gulf Underwriters Insurance Company (“Gulf’), issued to appellant, United Foundries, Inc. (“United”). United seeks coverage under the policy for its defense in a substantial-certainty intentional tort 1 lawsuit filed by a United employee. Gulf has denied that it has a duty to defend United because the intentional-tort claims in the underlying complaint are outside the coverage of the policy. The trial court held in favor of United, and the court of appeals…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ohio Government Risk Management Plan v. HarrisonOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- Cincinnati Insurance v. CPS Holdings, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2007
- Pilkington North America, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006
- Penn Traffic Co. v. AIU InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. DuggerOhio Supreme Court · 2010
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Hoyle v. DTJ Enterprises, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2015
- Helfrich v. Allstate Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Wesco Ins. Co. v. Roderick Linton Belfance, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- Acuity v. Masters Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
- Hartman v. Erie Ins. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.