Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Burch v. Sheffield-Sheffield Lake City School District Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1996No. 95-1096PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Burch asserts that the court of appeals erred in granting summary judgment in favor of the board and denying the requested writ of •mandamus. In order to be entitled to a writ of mandamus, Burch had to establish (1) a clear legal right to the requested back pay and related benefits, (2) a corresponding clear legal duty on the part of the board to grant her request for back pay and associated benefits, and (3) the lack of an adequate remedy in the ordinary course of the law. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 217, 218-219, 631 N.E.2d 150, 152.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Parsons v. FlemingOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Cassels v. Dayton City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Rollins v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State ex rel. Brown v. Milton-Union Exempted Village Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Alben v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State ex rel. Kabert v. Shaker Heights City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Alben v. State Emp. Relations Bd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State ex rel. United Auto Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of Am. v. Ohio Bur. of Workers' Comp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State ex rel. Kabert v. Shaker Hts. City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API