Legal Opinion

People v. Wolfe

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided May 28, 2009No. 08CA1564PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge LICHTENSTEIN.

Defendant, Daniel F. Wolfe, appeals the district court's order denying his postconviction motion that challenged the court's au thority to impose suspended sentences. We affirm.

In 2005, defendant pleaded guilty to three felony drug charges in three separate cases for offenses committed in 2004 and 2005. The court sentenced him to twelve years imprisonment in the first case. Because he was on bond at the time he committed the offenses leading to the other two cases, the court sentenced him to aggravated terms of fifteen years imprisonment in those cases. The court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hill v. DeWittSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
  2. People v. GoldmanColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  3. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  4. DePineda v. PriceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  5. Leyva v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. LuceroColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. People v. McCoyColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Estes v. WerlichDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2021
  4. People ex rel. S.N-V.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. People v. BoydColorado Court of Appeals · 2015

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API