Legal Opinion

People v. Goldman

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided July 11, 1996No. 95CA0939PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge HUME.

Defendant, Michael Winston Goldman, appeals the trial court’s order denying his Crim.P. 35(c) motion. We dismiss the appeal.

Pursuant to a plea agreement, defendant was convicted of first degree assault and a corresponding crime of violence count and was sentenced to a twelve-year prison term.

Defendant thereafter filed a pro se Crim.P. 35(c) motion, claiming that his plea had not been knowingly and voluntarily entered because he had received ineffective assistance of plea counsel and an inadequate Crim.P. 11 advisement from the trial court. As pertinent here, defendant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. HamptonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. People v. HickeyColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. People v. HamptonColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. People v. SimmsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Richard S. Demarest v. William Price Gale Norton, Attorney General of the State of ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Craig v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1999
  3. People v. ZunigaColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. People v. OsorioColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. People v. FinneyColorado Court of Appeals · 2012

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API