Legal Opinion

People v. Rogers

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 23, 1957No. Crim. 3255PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Defendant, an attorney, was charged with five counts of grand theft, each count being based on the charge that by false pretenses he took money improperly from his law clients. He was tried by the court without a jury, and was found guilty on three of the five counts. He appeals from the judgment of conviction, and from the order denying his motion for a new trial. He makes no attack on the sufficiency of the evidence. His sole contention is that, because of his health, and because he had no attorney, the trial court, as a matter of law, abused its discretion in compelling him to go to trial…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. In Re HessCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. AdamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. People v. IsbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  5. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. People v. RobertsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. TeitelbaumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. People v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. State v. MaryottCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1971
  5. People v. LoignonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API