Legal Opinion

Coffield v. Sunny Line Appliance, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 1, 1924No. 3939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONAHUE, Circuit Judge.

This appeal involves the validity, and, if valid, the question of infringement by appellee, of claims 8, 9, and 10 of United States letters patent No. 1,270,379, issued to James D. Coffield, June 25, 1918, on his application filed October 9, 1917. The patent relates to the form and arrangement of driving gear for washing machines and to the washing cylinder or clothes receptacle. The claims in suit are printed in the margin.1

*610The defendant in its answer denied the validity of these claims, pleaded a .number- of prior art patents, attached thereto certified copies of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mast, Foos & Co. v. Stover Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Grinnell Washing MacHine Co. v. E. E. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Herman v. Youngstown Car Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  4. American Fibre-Chamois Co. v. Buckskin-Fibre Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  5. Ferro Concrete Const. Co. v. Concrete Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brown v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1944
  2. Rubinstein v. Silex Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947
  3. General Machinery Corp. v. Clearing Mach. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
  4. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co. v. Pittsburgh Transformer Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Getz v. WeissCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API