Legal Opinion

Ferro Concrete Const. Co. v. Concrete Steel Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 6, 1913No. 2,298PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of Ohio, Western District; Howard C. Hollister, Judge. ‘Suit in equity by the Ferro Concrete Construction Company against the Concrete Steel Company and the Isaac Faller’s Sons Company. Decree for defendants, and complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

WARRINGTON, Circuit Judge.

The only question of importance in this case is. whether a certain patent is void upon its face for lack of invention. The suit was for infringement of letters patent No. 859,511, for “concrete floor construction,” granted to appellant as as-signee of the inventor, Louis H. Nolte. Apart from some minor features, the bill of complaint as amended is in the usual form. It was dismissed upon demurrer, and the plaintiff below appeals. The de-*667dared object of the invention is “a construction which will simplify and render less expensive the process of laying wooden sleepers…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Herman v. Youngstown Car Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  4. New York Belting & Packing Co. v. New Jersey Car Spring & Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Charles Boldt Co. v. Nivison-Weiskopf Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Proudfit Loose Leaf Co. v. Kalamazoo Loose Leaf Binder Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
  2. Ohmer Fare Register Co. v. OhmerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1916
  3. International Mausoleum Co. v. SievertCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  4. Schiebel Toy & Novelty Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1914
  5. Friend v. Burnham & Morrill Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1932

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API