Legal Opinion

Waring v. Stinchcomb

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 18, 1922PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pattison, L,

delivered the opinion of the Court-.

The bill in this ease was filed by Frank M. Stinchcomb and Sarah A. Stinchcomb, appellees, against the appellants.

The appellees own a tract of land lying at the month of the Magothy River, in Anne Arundel County, and bordering partly on the river and partly on the Chesapeake Bay.

The appellant Masonetta M. Waring owns a tract of land bordering on the Chesapeake Bay, lying to the east or southeast of the appellees’ land.

The land of the appellant Masonetta M. Waring, which is known as “Pettybones Rest,” was granted to Richard Rettybone by patent on…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lamprey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  2. Dunnock v. DunnockHigh Court of Chancery of Maryland · 1852
  3. Dowdle v. WheelerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  4. Shipley v. RitterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
  5. State v. StoneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bleck v. East Boston Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Wlodarek v. ThriftCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1940
  3. Rondesvedt v. RunningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Stinchcomb v. Realty Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1937
  5. Hudson House, Inc. v. RozmanWashington Supreme Court · 1973

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API