Rondesvedt v. Running

The point has grown imperceptibly, extending into the water from deposits which were made on and against lots 8 and 9. It does not abut any dry land owned by defendant. Plaintiff, as owner of lots 8 and 9, claims the entire point (hereinafter referred to as “alluvion”) as having been added, by accretion, to his lots.

Defendant does not challenge the general rule relied on, but advances two theories under which it ought not to be ap plied to the portion of the alluvion which lies southeasterly of the line (or extension thereof) between lot 7, which she owns, and lot 8. (1) She argues that the…