Legal Opinion

Hudson House, Inc. v. Rozman

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1973No. 42332PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

This action involves a highly unusual accretion in Grays Harbor County at the mouth of the Copalis River, where that river flows into the Pacific Ocean.

Respondent, Hudson House, Inc., is an Oregon corporation, and the plaintiff. This action was instituted to quiet title to all of the accretions lying adjacent to government lot 1, section 28, township 19 north, range 12 west of Willamette Meridian. After a trial, respondent prevailed and was awarded all of the disputed property. The several defendants have perfected this timely appeal.

All of government lot 1 was first conveyed by patent from…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Hughes v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Lamprey v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  5. Arkansas v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1918

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Irwin Concrete, Inc. v. Sun Coast Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  2. Henery v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  3. Peter Pan Seafoods, Inc. v. Olympic Foundry Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  4. Sea River Properties, LLC v. ParksOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Clippinger v. BirgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API