Legal Opinion

Dunnock v. Dunnock

High Court of Chancery of Maryland

Decided September 15, 1852PublishedCited by 31 opinions

[The facts of this case are sufficiently stated in the following opinion of the Chancellor.]

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor :

This case, which has been fully and ably argued by the counsel on both sides, comes before the Court upon a motion to dissolve the injunctions granted upon the filing of the bill, which motion is met on the other side with an application for the appointment of a receiver, as prayed for in the bill, but held over for the coming in of the answer.

The bill, though it probably makes a case which, if sustained *142by proof, would entitle the complainant to a divorce, a mensa et thoro does not pray for that relief, but simply that the property in question, sundry negroes, may be placed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wallingsford v. WallingsfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1825
  2. Albert v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1849
  3. Mix v. MixNew York Court of Chancery · 1814

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Moore v. McAllisterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  2. Arnegaard v. ArnegaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Langston v. LangstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Outlaw v. OutlawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  5. Sturgis v. Citizens National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API