Dunnock v. Dunnock
High Court of Chancery of Maryland
[The facts of this case are sufficiently stated in the following opinion of the Chancellor.]
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor :
This case, which has been fully and ably argued by the counsel on both sides, comes before the Court upon a motion to dissolve the injunctions granted upon the filing of the bill, which motion is met on the other side with an application for the appointment of a receiver, as prayed for in the bill, but held over for the coming in of the answer.
The bill, though it probably makes a case which, if sustained *142by proof, would entitle the complainant to a divorce, a mensa et thoro does not pray for that relief, but simply that the property in question, sundry negroes, may be placed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wallingsford v. WallingsfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1825
- Albert v. WinnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1849
- Mix v. MixNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
3Cited by31 opinions
- Moore v. McAllisterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
- Arnegaard v. ArnegaardNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
- Langston v. LangstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Outlaw v. OutlawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- Sturgis v. Citizens National BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.