Legal Opinion · Dissent

Craig v. Craig

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided October 28, 2010No. 1 CA-CV 08-0776Published

1DissentKessler, Judge

¶ 7 I respectfully dissent for two reasons. First, this case presents us with a tension between two lines of eases dealing with ap*510pellate jurisdiction which should be resolved by the Arizona Supreme Court. Under the first line of cases, Baumann v. Tuton, 180 Ariz. 370, 884 P.2d 256 (App.1994), and Smith v. Ariz. Citizens Clean Elections Comm’n, 212 Ariz. 407, 415, ¶ 38, 132 P.3d 1187, 1195 (2006), an appellant’s notice of appeal is deemed a nullity if it is filed while the appellant’s motion for new trial or other time-extending motion under Arizona Rule of Civil Appellate Procedure 9(b)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. BirminghamArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. In re Daniel H.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  3. Barassi v. MatisonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Davis v. Cessna Aircraft Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. Smith v. Arizona Citizens Clean Elections CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 2006

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API