Legal Opinion
In re Daniel H.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided June 18, 1996No. 15314; 15317; 15318PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.
The sole issue in this consolidated appeal is whether General Statutes § 46b-127,1 the man*367datoiy juvenile transfer statute, which incorporates No. 94-2, § 6, of the 1994 Public Acts, July Special Session (1994 amendment), wherein the legislature eliminated the right to an immediate appeal from a court order transferring a juvenile matter to the regular criminal docket of the Superior Court, applies to juveniles who were charged with offenses that occurred prior to October 1, 1994, the effective date of the amendment. The respondents, Daniel H., Jonathan M., and Michael C.,2 *368are juveniles…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- In re Valerie D.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- State v. WallsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- State v. WallsOhio Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. FaradaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Johnson v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.