In Re the Guardianship of the Persons & Estates of Morehouse
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. George H. Cabaniss, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.
The facts on this appeal are not in dispute. On January 3, 1916, the appellant, Frank B. More-house, and the respondent, Merle M. Morehouse, his wife, separated. There were two minor children of the marriage. The mother took the two small children from the family home in San Francisco and went to Alameda County, where she still resides. The father remained at the family, home in San Francisco. On June 18, 1916, the father went to Alameda and brought the children back to San Francisco, writing to his wife that he had done so and inviting her to return to the family home. She neither answered…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. Ah SamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
- In Re the Estate & Guardianship of EikerenkotterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In Re LundbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Whyler v. Van TigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by25 opinions
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Hennessy v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Kandjounzeff v. GardinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Richert v. Benson Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Mueller v. Elba Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1942
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.