Legal Opinion
Brinton v. Federal Land Bank
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided June 30, 1942No. 2462PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
On December 4, 1933, the appellant, as a farmer debtor, petitioned the district court for relief under Section 75, subs, a-r, of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 203, subs, a-r, and scheduled certain land on which the appellee held mortgages. After more than three years had elapsed, during which no offer of composition or extension as contemplated by subsections a-r of the Act was made, the mortgagee moved to dismiss the proceedings and to allow it to foreclose its mortgages in the state court. On March 6, 1937, after hearing on the motion to dismiss, the trial court…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kalb v. FeuersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Wright v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Wayne United Gas Co. v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Wright v. Union Central Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. BartelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Smith v. Federal Land BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Paradise Land & Livestock Co. v. Federal Land Bank of BerkeleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1942
- Peterson v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Wheat v. Texas Land & Mortgage Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945