Legal Opinion
Banneker Ventures, LLC v. Graham
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 22, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2013-0391PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge
Banneker Ventures, LLC (Banneker) is a developer that had an exclusive right to negotiate with Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA) for the lease and development of certain real property, but failed to reach a final agreement. In this lawsuit, Banneker alleges tortious interference with contract and business expectancy and civil conspiracy. Defendant Jim Graham moves to dismiss. The motion will be denied.
I. FACTS
The facts are set forth in detail in this Court’s prior opinion and the opinion of the D.C. Circuit and will…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Banneker Ventures, LLC v. GrahamDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Everson v. Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2020
- Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Ollar v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022