Legal Opinion
Klayman v. Judicial Watch, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided February 20, 2018No. Civil Action No. 06–670 (CKK)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of this Court's [433] Order and [434] Memorandum Opinion denying leave to amend his Second Amended Complaint ("SAC"). ECF No. 440. Upon consideration of the briefing,1 the relevant legal authorities, and the record as a whole, the Court DENIES Plaintiff's [440] Motion for Reconsideration of the Court's Substantive Order of January 19, 2018 ("Motion for Reconsideration"), for the reasons set forth below and in the Court's Memorandum Opinion of January 19, 2018, ECF No. 434 ("Jan. 19, 2018 Mem. Op."), which is…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Richardson, Roy Dale v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius, Baer & Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Kurd v. Republic of Turk.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius, Baer & Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Documented v. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Kurd v. Republic of TurkeyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.