Legal Opinion

Ryan Distributing Corporation v. Caley

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided January 17, 1945No. 8656PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff, Ryan Distributing Corporation (called Ryan hereafter), sought a declaratory judgment under § 274d of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 400, that United States patent, 1,945,932 for a Hair Curler or Waver granted on February 6, 1934 to defendant, Caley, is invalid or not infringed by plaintiff. Defendant’s counterclaim, filed with his answer, alleged infringement by plaintiff and asked damages. Defendant demanded a jury trial on the counterclaim and also upon the issue raised by the declaratory judgment complaint and answer. This was granted and the case was…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. DuncanSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Slocum v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Radio Corp. of America v. Radio Engineering Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  5. Baltimore & Carolina Line, Inc. v. RedmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Burnham Chemical Co. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
  2. Packwood v. Briggs & Stratton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
  3. Gulf Oil Corporation v. Mrs. Eva Wright and the Standard Insurance Company, IntervenerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  4. Moorhouse v. Boeing Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. McClina v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API