Legal Opinion
White v. E. L. Bruce Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 29, 1947No. 9264PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
In the District Court the plaintiffs (hereinafter referred to as White) brought a declaratory judgment suit against defendant (hereinafter referred to as Bruce or patent owner). The object of the suit was to get a declaration of invalidity and non-infringement of three patents owned by Bruce. The three patents are: Partee-Gray Patent 2,288,585, Partee-Gray Patent 2,341,161 (referred to hereafter as ’161), and Partee Patent 2,276,253. White won in the District Court on his contention that the patents were invalid. He lost on the question of 'infringement, but, of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Eames v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Textile MacHine Works v. Louis Hirsch Textile MacHines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hazeltine Corporation v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Oliver v. City of Shattuck Ex Rel. VersluisCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Noble Co. v. The C. S. Johnson CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- E. L. Bruce Co. v. Bradley Lumber Co. of ArkansasDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1948
- Timken-Detroit Axle Co. v. Alma Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Galion Metallic Vault Co. v. Edward G. Budd Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- United Shoe Machinery Corp. v. KamborianCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.