Legal Opinion
Hyman v. United States
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided August 18, 1992No. Civ. A. 2:91cv00736PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CLARKE, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on the motion of the defendant, the United States of America, for partial summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the reasons stated below, the Court grants the defendant’s motion.
Plaintiff, Andre Hyman, alleges he was injured in an automobile accident which occurred on April 12, 1990 inside the Norfolk Naval Base. At the time of the accident, plaintiff was employed by the Norfolk Shipbuilding and Drydock Corporation (“Norshipco”) as a handyman and was involved in the installation of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Henderson v. Central Tel. Co. of VirginiaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1987
- Nichols v. VVKR, INC.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Turnage v. Northern Virginia Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Coulter v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- Hose v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Perry v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- Ryan v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2003
- Gibbs v. Newport News Shipbuildng & Drydock Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.