Legal Opinion
Hose v. United States
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2009No. Civil Action 07-1805 (PLF)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff David R. Hose brings suit against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671 et seq., for his alleged exposure to anthrax spores while working in a State Department facility. This matter is before the Court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure. After careful consideration of the parties’ papers and the entire record in the case, the Court will grant defendant’s motion and dismiss…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- City of Kenosha v. BrunoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Loeffler v. FrankSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Erie Insurance Exchange v. HeffernanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barker v. All Roofs by DominicSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2020
- Barker v. All Roofs by DominicSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
- Gibbs v. Newport News Shipbuildng & Drydock Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2012