Legal Opinion
United Shoe MacHinery Corporation v. Industrial Shoe MacHinery Corporation
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided August 20, 1964No. 6281_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDRICH, Circuit Judge.
This is an action by United Shoe Machinery Corporation, United, against Industrial Shoe Machinery Corporation, Industrial, for infringement of three patents, Nos. 2,926,367; 2,986,753, and 3,061,852, relating to toe lasting machinery. The district court found all three patents invalid and, without making findings as to infringement, entered a judgment of invalidity on Industrial’s counterclaim, and dismissed the complaint. United appeals.
It is sometimes preferable for a trial court to pass on infringement as well as validity, not only to enable an appellate court to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- McCord Corp. v. Beacon Auto Radiator Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- Lincoln Stores, Inc. v. Nashua Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946
- Hap Corporation v. Heyman Manufacturing Company, Heyman Manufacturing Company v. Hap CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
- Pioneer Credit Corporation v. Samuel E. Bloomberg, AssigneeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Scully Signal Company v. Electronics Corporation of America, Scully Signal Company v. Electronics Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
- New England Electric System v. Securities and Exchange CommissionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
- Contour Saws, Inc. v. The L.S. Starrett CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
- Harris-Intertype Corporation v. Photon, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1965
- Automated Building Components, Inc. v. Hydro-Air Engineering, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.