Legal Opinion
Harris-Intertype Corporation v. Photon, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided August 30, 1965No. 6482PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant makes only one substantial attack upon the judgment of the District Court holding Tansel patents No. 2,725,-803 and No. 2,896,523 invalid for lack of invention, Photon, Inc. v. Harris-Intertype Corporation, 235 F.Supp. 921 (1964). It is that the Court failed to recognize that the Tansel patents disclosed the photocell-slit control of the flash, which appellant asserts is the key to a commercially successful photocomposing machine. We do not so read the District Court’s opinion. In any event, we ourselves have carefully studied the record and are satisfied that the Tansel patents,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- McCord Corp. v. Beacon Auto Radiator Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- Associated Folding Box Co., Inc. v. LevkoffCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- United Shoe MacHinery Corporation v. Industrial Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1964
- Photon, Inc. v. Harris-Intertype Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1964
3Cited by4 opinions
- Lumpkin v. MeskillDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1974
- Potter Instrument Co., Inc. v. ODEC Computer Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1974
- Itek Corp v. Information International, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1979
- Frank W. Egan & Co. v. Modern Plastic Machinery Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1966