Legal Opinion
Grassi v. Ulrich
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 20, 1996PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the matter remitted to that Court for further proceedings in accordance with this memorandum.
Plaintiff Paul Grassi commenced this personal injury action against defendants for injuries to his neck, left arm and left hand allegedly sustained after the car driven by defendant Kurt Ulrich collided with plaintiff’s vehicle. Defendants stipulated that Ulrich’s negligence caused the accident, but presented expert proof to establish that plaintiff’s injuries were the result of a preexisting…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Moffatt v. MoffattNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Moffatt v. MoffattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by76 opinions
- Skowronski v. MordinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- State v. Derrick B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Farrukh v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Bertelle v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Adamy v. ZiriakusAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.