Stacy S. Killon v. Robert A. Parrotta
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Abdus-Salaam, J.
The issue presented is whether the Appellate Division applied the correct test in setting aside the jury verdict and concluding as a matter of law that defendant was the initial aggressor in the physical altercation between the parties, rendering a justification defense unavailable to defendant during retrial of the case. We hold that the Appellate Division did not apply the “utterly irrational” test required to make that determination as a matter of law. Applying that test to the trial evidence and in consideration of the jury instruction given, we hold…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Campbell v. City of ElmiraNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Killon v. ParrottaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
3Cited by68 opinions
- Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. v. A.O Smith Water Prods. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2018
- Natoli v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- Schuster v. SourourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Glynn v. AltobelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
- IGS Realty Co., L.P. v. BradyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.