Legal Opinion

Stacy S. Killon v. Robert A. Parrotta

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 27, 2016No. 163PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Abdus-Salaam, J.

The issue presented is whether the Appellate Division applied the correct test in setting aside the jury verdict and concluding as a matter of law that defendant was the initial aggressor in the physical altercation between the parties, rendering a justification defense unavailable to defendant during retrial of the case. We hold that the Appellate Division did not apply the “utterly irrational” test required to make that determination as a matter of law. Applying that test to the trial evidence and in consideration of the jury instruction given, we hold…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Lolik v. Big v. Supermarkets, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Campbell v. City of ElmiraNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Killon v. ParrottaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig. v. A.O Smith Water Prods. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 2018
  2. Natoli v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  3. Schuster v. SourourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
  4. Glynn v. AltobelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  5. IGS Realty Co., L.P. v. BradyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API