Legal Opinion

Dau v. Pence

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1943No. 28759PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

— Plaintiff, Ernest Dau, brought this action against Robert Pence, as administrator of the estate of Elizabeth Sewell, for specific performance of an oral contract, alleged to have been made by decedent, to make a will devising all her property to him. The administrator answered by a general denial.

When the cause was called for trial, the state filed a motion for leave to intervene, supported by an affidavit of the chairman of the tax commission, alleging that Elizabeth Sewell died without heirs and intestate; and that, “in the event plaintiff herein is unable to secure a favorable judgment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henry v. HenryWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Wayman v. MillerWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  3. In Re Swartwood Welsher EstatesWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Aho v. AholaWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. In re the Estates of StewartNew York Surrogate's Court · 1897

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jennings v. D'HoogheWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Humphries v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Payn v. HogeWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  4. Widman v. MaurerWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Kalavros v. Deposit Guaranty Bank & Trust Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API