Legal Opinion

Jennings v. D'Hooghe

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1946No. 29742PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

This action was instituted to compel specific performance of an oral contract. The complaint alleged facts showing the death of John Tonjum and the appointment of C. J. D’Hooghe as administrator of his estate. Plaintiff then alleged that, during Tonjum’s lifetime, he and Tonjum had entered into a contract whereby it was agreed that,

“. . . if plaintiff would give up his work and act as his housekeeper, cook, nurse and care for the garden, he would provide plaintiff with a comfortable home and living, and in case plaintiff should survive him, he would leave plaintiff all of his estate, whether…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Alexander v. LewesWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Edwall v. JessephWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Allen v. DillardWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. McClanahan v. McClanahanWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  5. McCullough v. McCulloughWashington Supreme Court · 1929

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ThorntonWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Granquist v. McKeanWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Bale v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. Humphries v. RivelandWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Cook v. CookWashington Supreme Court · 1972

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API