Legal Opinion

Aho v. Ahola

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1940No. 27925PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The plaintiff brought this action seeking a decree declaring that she was the owner, and entitled to the possession, of certain real and personal property. One of the defendants was not served with process, and no further reference will be made to her. The other defendants were William Ahola, as administrator of the estate of Heikki Romppanen, deceased, and two nieces. The administrator answered, saying that he refused to allow the claim of the nieces to the property of the deceased because he desired the court to determine the matter. The nieces answered, denying the claimed right of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Resor v. SchaeferWashington Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jennings v. D'HoogheWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Paull v. EarlywineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1945
  3. Blodgett v. LoweWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Widman v. MaurerWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  5. Arnold v. BeckmanWashington Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API