Legal Opinion

Minor v. Foote

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 27, 1929No. Docket No. 6773PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained as a result of being struck by an automobile belonging to defendant Adelaide MacSweeney and driven by defendant Georgena Foote. At the conclusion of the trial the action was dismissed as to Adelaide MacSweeney. Plaintiff sued for $15,000 general damages and $777.06 special damages. The defendant Georgena Foote, although denying liability for the accident, stipulated during the trial, which took place before a jury, that plaintiff had necessarily expended the sum of $777.06 for the treatment of her…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hamlin v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Finkle v. TaitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Keena v. United RailRoads of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
  4. Jones v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1925
  5. Devecchio v. RickettsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Amore v. Di RestaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. Hughes v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Wickman v. LowensteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Evans v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Hare v. CanfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API