Legal Opinion

Shockley v. Hill

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 17, 1932No. 12,904PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hilliard

A code action, commonly styled replevin, for the possession of an automobile.

It appears that Hill, doing’ business as Hill Auto Sales, was a dealer in automobiles at Blue Island, Illinois, and Harvey, Illinois; that June 27, 1929, Hill Auto Sales, by one Jenner, manager for Hill, issued a bill of sale for tbe automobile to one Paul Goodman, who became possessed of tbe car; that tbe bill recited tbe purchase price was paid by check, but the check, drawn on a Chicago bank, was dated July 1, 1929, which, although Hill deposited it timely, was not paid; that on receipt of notice of dishonor of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Michigan Central Railroad v. PhillipsIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Linn v. ReidWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Wyman v. Colorado National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1879
  4. Kemper Grain Co. v. HarbourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. Klein v. MunzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kelley Kar Co. v. FinklerOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Rigney v. SwingleyMontana Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Pomeroy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  4. Tom W. Carpenter Equipment Company, Inc., a Texas Corporation v. General Electric Credit Corporation, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
  5. General Credit Corp. v. Bill Olsen's Motor, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API