Legal Opinion

Michigan Central Railroad v. Phillips

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1871PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Appeal from tbe Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. Joseph E. Gary, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sheldon

The principal question which arises on this record is, whether there was such a delivery of the highwines in controversy, to Ames, as to vest title in him.

The contract of sale yas from Moir & Co. to Ames, and on the 18th of July, 1870, Moir & Co. not having the highwines on hand, Phillips & Carmichael, the appellees, commission merchants of Chicago, for Moir & Co., purchased from Conk-lin & Bro. and Lynch & Co. one hundred barrels of highwines, fifty from each firm, to be delivered on that day to Wilson Ames, with directions, when delivered, to collect from him $1.07 per gallon, that being…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Root v. FrenchNew York Supreme Court · 1835
  2. Mowrey v. WalshNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  3. Butters v. HaughwoutIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Brundage v. CampIllinois Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Haggerty v. PalmerNew York Court of Chancery · 1822

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Scharff v. MeyerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
  3. Ames v. MoirIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Conrad v. FisherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Taylor v. TurnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API