Wyman v. Colorado National Bank
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to County Court of Arapahoe County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Plaintiff in error (and plaintiff also in the court below), on the 10th day of January, 1877, drew his sight draft on one George G. Dainty, Eugby, England, for the sum of one hundred pounds sterling, payable tc the order of George C. Corning, a banker of Boulder, Colorado, and delivered the same to the said Corning to collect and place to the credit of the plaintiff’s account at the bank of the said Corning, at Boulder. Corning immediately transmitted the draft by letter to the defendant, which letter is as follows:
Boulder, Colorado, Jan’y 13, 1877.
¥m. B. Berger, Esq.,
Cashier, Denver:
Dear…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Brush v. ScribnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1836
- Manning v. McClureIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
- Atkinson v. BrooksSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
3Cited by16 opinions
- Garrison v. Union Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1905
- Winfield National Bank v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
- Coors v. German Nat. BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
- McStay Supply Co. v. StoddardNevada Supreme Court · 1912
- Gumaer v. SowersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1903
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.