Legal Opinion
Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. United States
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided August 9, 1938PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
L. HAND, Circuit Judge.
This suit is in substance the same as Baltimore & Ohio R. R. et al. v. United States, decided in July 1936, by a court composed of the same members. Baltimore & O. R. R. et al. v. United States, D. C., 15 F.Supp. 674. No appeal was taken from the decree entered therein, but the complaining shippers asked the Commission for a rehearing in the hope of strengthening their position. At the conclusion of this the Commission again passed an order, practically identical with the first, requiring the roads to cease from asking unreasonable rates upon the carriage of methanol,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Arkadelphia Milling Co. v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. SettleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Arkadelphia Co. v. St. Louis SW Ry. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Southern States Masonry v. Mission Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
- Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Commodity Credit Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
- Southern Pacific Transportation Company v. Interstate Commerce CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- St. Louis & San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Texas Automatic Sprinkler Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953