Legal Opinion
Southern Pacific Transportation Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 6, 1977No. 75-2175PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARZER, District Judge:
This is a proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 2342 to set aside an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission. Under the terms of an order of the Commission served August 6,1974, petitioners were required to cease and desist from engaging in or contracting for certain trucking operations within California, found by the Commission to be in violation of the Interstate Commerce Act. (Southern Pacific Transportation Co., et al.—Investigation of Operations, 120 M.C.C. 236 (1974).) Petitioners ask the Court to set aside that order, as well as a subsequent order of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Coe v. ErrolSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. SettleSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Federal Compress & Warehouse Co. v. McLeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Tucker v. Casualty Reciprocal ExchangeDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pittsburgh-Johnstown-Altoona Express, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- National Retail Transportation, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Martinez v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Progressive Casualty Insurance v. HooverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Martinez v. Empire Fire & Marine Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.