Legal Opinion

Blum v. Neilson

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1883No. Case No. 4373PublishedCited by 33 opinions

Appeal from Eastland. Tried below before the Hon. E. B. Wheeler.

1Opinion of the Court

Willie, Chief Justice.—

A motion has been filed by counsel for appellee to strike out the statement of facts in this cause because there appears in the transcript no order entered up by the district •court during the term at which the cause was tried, allowing a statement of facts to be made up and filed, as this one appears to be, after the adjournment of the court for the term.

It appears, however, that at the succeeding term of the court, on application of appellants, a nunc pro tunc order was entered up, granting the proper leave in reference to making and filing the statement of facts. In…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Camoron v. ThurmondTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Chambers v. HodgesTexas Supreme Court · 1848

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Williams v. PittsTexas Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Fort Worth & Denver City Railway Co. v. RobertsTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HaynesTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Hickey v. BehrensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  5. Arrington v. McDanielTexas Supreme Court · 1930

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API